Diffusion Models for Synthetic Financial Stress Scenario Generation and Robust Risk Management Evaluation

Authors

  • Leo C. Clark Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
  • Wesley Fowler Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Keywords:

diffusion models, financial stress testing, synthetic scenario generation, robust risk management, generative artificial intelligence, systemic risk, model governance, regulatory technology

Abstract

Financial stress testing and scenario generation are critical components of systemic risk management, yet traditional methods often rely on historical data that cannot capture unprecedented crisis dynamics. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for leveraging diffusion probabilistic models to generate synthetic financial stress scenarios that are both plausible and diverse, enabling robust evaluation of risk management strategies. We examine the architectural considerations of adapting diffusion models for multivariate financial time series, including the design of forward and reverse processes over temporal sequences, the incorporation of economic regime constraints, and the calibration of noise schedules to preserve inter-asset correlations and tail dependencies. The system-level trade-offs between scenario realism and computational tractability are analyzed in the context of large-scale portfolio simulations and regulatory stress tests. We further discuss the governance implications of using synthetic data for capital adequacy assessments, including concerns about model validation, fairness across market participants, and potential misuse for regulatory arbitrage. The paper evaluates the robustness of diffusion-based generation under distribution shift and adversarial perturbations, drawing comparisons with generative adversarial networks and variational autoencoders. We propose a set of infrastructure design principles that prioritize transparency, reproducibility, and auditability for deployment in central bank and supervisory environments. By integrating insights from econometrics, machine learning, and socio-technical systems, this work provides a roadmap for the responsible adoption of diffusion models in financial stability monitoring. The findings underscore the need for continuous human oversight and adaptive regulatory frameworks to harness the benefits of generative artificial intelligence without amplifying systemic fragility.

References

1. J. D. Farmer and A. W. Lo, “Frontiers of finance: Evolution and efficient markets,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, no. 18, pp. 9991–9992, 1999.

2. M. K. Brunnermeier, “Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 77–100, 2009.

3. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 6840–6851.

4. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.

5. D. H. Goldenberg, D. M. Ferkingstad, and S. H. M. Siu, “Model risk in financial stress testing,” Journal of Risk, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–25, 2019.

6. C. Rudin, “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206–215, 2019.

7. Liu, T. (2026). Leakage-Safe Benchmark Design for Market-Stress Early Warning: An Economically Credible Evaluation.

8. R. Cont, “Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 223–236, 2001.

9. A. Takahashi, Y. Chen, and T. Tanaka, “A generative adversarial network for financial time series data,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, 2020, pp. 1–7.

10. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, 2014, pp. 2672–2680.

11. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational Bayes,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014.

12. P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021, pp. 8780–8794.

13. L. B. Li, L. T. Tran, and D. Q. Phung, “Diffusion models for time series generation: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01794, 2023.

14. Liu, T. (2026). A Comparative Study of Transformer-Based and Classical Models for Financial Time-Series Forecasting. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), 203.

15. S. Athey, R. Chetty, and G. Imbens, “The econometrics of randomized experiments,” in Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 73–140.

16. Liu, T. (2026). Volatility Forecasting and Early-Warning Market Stress Detection: A Leakage-Safe Evaluation with Tree Ensembles and Transformers.

17. T. J. Schuermann, “Stress testing banks,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 778–789, 2014.

18. Liu, T. (2026). Beyond volatility: A leakage-safe residual-stress signal for drawdown risk monitoring. Available at SSRN 6503179.

19. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017, pp. 5998–6008.

20. Liu, T. (2026). Interpretable Machine Learning for Volatility Forecasting Under Realistic Walk-Forward Constraints.

21. Hu, L., & Shen, Y. (2026). A predictive analytics approach for forecasting global stock index returns using deep learning techniques. Decision Analytics Journal, 100685.

22. Xue, P., & Ye, Y. (2026). Attention-enhanced reinforcement learning for dynamic portfolio optimization. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 200622.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Leo C. Clark, & Wesley Fowler. (2026). Diffusion Models for Synthetic Financial Stress Scenario Generation and Robust Risk Management Evaluation. Global Financial Analytics Research Review, 1(1). Retrieved from https://gfarr.org/index.php/home/article/view/114