Risk Assessment and Management in Cross-Border Investment Portfolios
Keywords:
Cross-Border Investment, Risk Assessment, Socio-Technical Infrastructure, Systemic Resilience, Financial Market Infrastructure (FMI), Artificial Intelligence, Portfolio Management, Geopolitical RiskAbstract
The contemporary landscape of global finance is increasingly defined by the complex interplay between traditional capital markets and emerging socio-technical infrastructures. As cross-border investment portfolios expand in both volume and structural complexity, the traditional paradigms of risk assessment—largely rooted in localized market volatility and creditworthiness—are proving insufficient to capture systemic vulnerabilities. This research provides a comprehensive examination of risk assessment and management strategies within cross-border investment portfolios, emphasizing the role of large-scale systems and artificial intelligence in modernizing financial governance. We explore the structural trade-offs inherent in diversifying across disparate jurisdictions, where regulatory fragmentation often creates friction between efficiency and robustness. The paper details how financial market infrastructures (FMIs) act as critical conduits for both stability and contagion, necessitating a shift from static risk monitoring to dynamic, AI-enabled orchestration. By analyzing the intersection of geopolitical acts, regulatory quality, and digital finance ecosystems, we propose a multi-dimensional framework for systemic resilience. This framework integrates technical advancements in behavioral anomaly detection with socio-technical insights into institutional capacity and policy alignment. Ultimately, the study argues that sustainable cross-border investment requires a fundamental redesign of oversight mechanisms, moving toward federated data models and coordinated multi-stakeholder governance to mitigate the "tragedy of the commons" inherent in global risk-taking.
References
Baloyi, S., & Lotter, M. (2024). Suitability of risk assessment tools used during the portfolio recommendation process. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v17i1.896
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
Li, F., & Perez-Saiz, H. (2018). Measuring systemic risk across financial market infrastructures. Journal of Financial Stability, 34(C), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.08.003
Micán Rincón, C. A., Rubiano-Ovalle, O., Delgado Hurtado, C., & Andrade-Eraso, C. A. (2023). Project portfolio risk management: Bibliometry and collaboration scientometric domain analysis. Heliyon, 9(10), e19136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19136
Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2–47.
Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). CoVaR. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1705–1741.
Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.
Borio, C. (2011). Implementing a macroprudential framework: Blending boldness and detachment. Capital Markets Law Journal, 6(1), 15–33.
Brunnermeier, M. K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2009). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201–2238.
Chen, H., & Yang, Y. (2025). The impact of digital financial market infrastructure on spillover risk. Taylor & Francis Financial Systems Research, 12(2), 45–67.
Danielsson, J., James, K. R., Valenzuela, M., & Zer, I. (2016). Model risk of risk models. Journal of Financial Stability, 23(C), 79–91.
Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial networks. Management Science, 47(2), 236–249.
Engle, R. F. (2012). Dynamic conditional correlations: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350.
Glasserman, P., & Young, H. P. (2016). Contagion in financial networks. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 779–831.
Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351–355.
He, Z., & Krishnamurthy, A. (2013). Intermediary asset pricing. The American Economic Review, 103(2), 732–770.
Iyer, R., & Peydró, J. L. (2011). Interbank contagion at work: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(4), 1337–1377.
Jin, X., & Nadal De Simone, F. (2020). Monetary policy and systemic risk-taking in the Euro area investment fund industry. Journal of Financial Stability, 49(C), 100755.
Kaufman, G. G. (1994). Bank contagion: A review of theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Services Research, 8(2), 123–150.
Kodres, L. E., & Pritsker, M. (2002). A rational expectations model of financial contagion. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 769–799.
Kyle, A. S., & Xiong, W. (2001). Contagion as a wealth effect. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1401–1440.
Mazzoli, C., & Fabrizio, S. (2023). Behavioral risk profiling in the digital age. International Review of Economics, 70(2), 115–134.
Obstfeld, M., & Taylor, A. M. (2004). Global Capital Markets: Integration, Crisis, and Growth. Cambridge University Press.
Rajan, R. G. (2006). Has financial development made the world riskier? European Financial Management, 12(4), 499–533.
Shin, H. S. (2009). Reflections on Northern Rock: The bank run that beheaded the regulator. International Journal of Central Banking, 5(1), 101–119.
Stulz, R. M. (2005). The limits of financial globalization. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), 1595–1638.
Tirole, J. (2011). Illiquidity and all its friends. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 287–325.
Upper, C. (2011). Simulation methods to assess the resilience of financial systems to contagion. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(1), 15–25.
Vijayakumar, R. (2025). AI-enabled systems for tightening border management OODA loops. World Customs Journal, 19(1), 22–39.
Zhang, F. (2025). Behavioral recognition and risk assessment in cross-border transactions. Academia Nexus Journal, 1(1), 102–118.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Global Financial Analytics Research Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
